🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, actor Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for portraying Vladimir Putin in a cinematic adaptation. The movie, though, may align so closely with the carefully constructed version promoted by Russian state media that, domestically, it functions as a endorsement instead of a challenge.

The Crafted Superhero

Over a long period, the Kremlin and its entertainment industry have worked together to craft a made-to-measure version of Putin. This figure is a political superhero without age or mistakes, a former spy reimagined as a Russian James Bond who consistently understands more than he reveals.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the actual person.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a television show launched last October, helmed by a Kremlin supporter. Its main character is a fictional security officer inexplicably chosen to “rescue” Russia from disorder. While the character's name a different name, the implication is clear: the hero must be a known figure from the secret services.

International depictions often end up reinforcing this identical story rather than undercutting it. A new film based on a bestselling satirical novel sets out to undermine the leader's mythology by framing him as a symptom but as a consequence, moving the focus to the political machinery around him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

On screen, the president is shown as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to steady the nation because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. The oligarchs approach him and all but beg him to take the top job. He replies is that he would rather govern from the background, desiring permanent power.

This narrative is the Kremlin’s export myth: the detached, unwilling mastermind shaped by destiny. In reality, these events took place.

The Truth Behind the Selection

No one ever begged him to take the job. The position was effectively a selection process with many contenders. At the centre to this process stood a powerful businessman from the Yeltsin era who planned to control the country de facto.

• The shortlist featured various figures, among them a reformer subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• According to a journalist who studied his rise, the chosen candidate merely met the necessary criteria: loyal, from the security services, and politically neutral.
• A property developer close to the events said the primary requirement was manageability and faithfulness, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a powerful leader, they needed someone controllable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Experts agree that the notion of Putin as a master operative was constructed retrospectively. Stories about his “recruitment work” in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. Fundamentally, he was an administrator and routine duties, a mid-level functionary not engaged in actual agent work.

Curiously, the move to framing him as a “007” could partly have been triggered by the actor's arrival as James Bond. His harder version led local outlets and online audiences to make comparisons with their leader. Edited images replacing the actor's likeness with Putin’s appeared on city centers, feeding the increasing trend to see him as a Russian 007.

A Propaganda Win?

Given the casting, an actor well-liked by Russian audiences, the authorities are likely to seize the chance to portray this choice as a small victory. The film's exclusion of mass protests, the opposition, or prominent activists in the story, even though it includes the past decade, is a pleasant bonus for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, the president is frequently an omnipotent figure who remains unseen directly. He is hinted at through portraits or calls “from above”. In this new film, he finally acquires a famous actor's visage—one that may inadvertently echo the very myths it perhaps aims to examine.