🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “total contradiction” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Documents seen by journalists originating from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the African officials requests plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a pending law that include lowering the recommended coverage of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on scented cigarette varieties, and reduced sanctions for any firms breaking the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“If I was a politician, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Over seven thousand citizens a year die from tobacco-related illnesses, according to WHO calculations.

Chimbala said the letter was understood to have been copied to multiple official agencies and was in circulating through community advocacy networks.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. Last month, global health authorities raised concerns that the cigarette manufacturers was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“We see evidence of business advocacy globally. Tobacco company fingerprints are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN international gathering,” stated Jorge Alday.

Likely impacts

“When public health regulation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the cost might be borne in human lives who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and mandating that visual health alerts cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the corporation proposes this be reduced to 30% or 50% “according to global recommended threshold”, deferred for no less than one year after the legislation is approved.

Global health authorities specifically advises a warning should cover at least 50% of the front of a pack “and attempt to encompass as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy sixty-five percent of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The company seeks the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would push consumers toward “black market” products. The company proposes prohibiting a smaller list of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The proposed legislation recommends punishments for multiple violations “varying from a fraction of annual sales to a decade in prison”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the corporate leader of the Zambian branch states the corporation is focused on ethical business practices” and “supports the objectives of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the connected wellbeing effects” but asserts that “some regulations can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued the company's suggested modifications would “dilute these regulations so much that the necessary effect for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that multiple comparable regulations operated within the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “total double standard”, he commented.

“We exist in a international community. When I cultivate smoking products in my property and gather the crop and market the products – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to enrich myself and all the generations of my children while my neighbour’s children are succumbing … is in itself absolute spiritual collapse.”

Tobacco control legislation in the United Kingdom or other countries had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Formal company response

A BAT Zambia spokesperson said: “BAT Zambia conducts its activities following with relevant national regulations. Further, the company participates in the state's regulatory development in line with the suitable systems which enable interested party involvement in policymaking.”

The company was “not against rules”, the representative commented, adding that minors should be protected from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We champion evolving legislation to accomplish desired population health targets, while acknowledging the spectrum of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, mentioning that BAT’s proposals “reflect the realities of the Zambian market and cigarette sector, which includes rising levels of illegal commerce”.

The country's office of trade, commerce and industry was solicited for statement.